Free in Nova and every plan
Loading (LCP), responsiveness (INP) and visual stability (CLS) measured with the people who visit your site — not in a lab. By page, by day and separately for phones and computers, at the 75th percentile like Google Search Console.
What it is for
A lab test runs on one fast computer. Your visitors use older phones and slow networks — that is what Visitics measures.
Pages are sorted by speed, so you know where an improvement helps the most visitors.
Google uses Core Web Vitals in its ranking signals; the SEO audit of Visitics reads the same data.
How it works
LCP, INP, CLS and TTFB at the 75th percentile with their rating, speed over time against the “good” threshold, and phones against computers.
Every page with its metrics and the share of good, average and poor visits — the slowest on top.
Screenshots of the Visitics dashboard with demo data.
In detail
A page is good when the 75th percentile of its visits stays within LCP 2.5 s, INP 200 ms, CLS 0.1 and TTFB 0.8 s, and poor beyond 4 s, 500 ms, 0.25 and 1.8 s. The shares of good, average and poor visits are exact, not estimated.
Values are kept in histograms, not as daily averages, so the 75th percentile of a week or a month is computed from all of its visits. Averaging daily percentiles would hide slow days; a histogram does not.
From Aura, a sample of about one pageview in ten loads a small extra script. It names the element of the Largest Contentful Paint with the parts of its time — the server, waiting, loading and drawing — the slowest interaction with its input delay, processing and presentation, and the source of the largest layout shift.
The values come from the browser’s own measurements and travel with the other data of the page. The detailed script runs only on the sample and only on sites that switch it on; it sends selectors and the address of the main image, never a text of the page.
Slow loading triggers an alert the next morning and the speed is part of the weekly report. The SEO audit reads the same real visits, so a slow page with many visits climbs the list of what to fix.
Everything it does
Privacy
Plans
The values come straight from the price list. Every new organization tries Aura free for 14 days, without a payment card.
| Novafree for good | Pulse€9 a month | Aura€29 a month | Luna€79 a month | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Web Vitals from real visits | Included | Included | Included | Included |
| What slows the main image and clicks down | Not in this plan | Not in this plan | Included | Included |
| History | 1 month | 6 months | 12 months | 24 months |
| Start free | Choose Pulse | Choose Aura | Choose Luna |
Questions
PageSpeed Insights runs a lab test on one simulated device. Visitics measures the real visits of the last days on your visitors’ devices — closer to the field data of Search Console.
No. The speed is read from the browser’s own measurements and sent with the other data in the background; the detailed causes are measured on a sample of visits only.
Not all of them — Chromium browsers (Chrome, Edge, Opera, Samsung Internet) report every metric, other browsers some. Each metric is computed from the visits that report it.
Yes, Core Web Vitals are in every plan. The detailed causes of slowness are in Aura and Luna.
INP needs an interaction — a click, a tap or a key press — and a browser that reports it. A page that visitors only read has few or no INP values.
No. Core Web Vitals are measured by the tracking script on every page. The detailed causes are switched on in the site settings, from Aura.
Goes well with
One line of code and the first data within seconds. Aura free for 14 days, then Nova for good — no payment card.